subagent-driven-development
Subagent-driven development is a methodology that executes plans by dispatching fresh subagents per task, with two-stage reviews for spec compliance and code quality.
Browse and install thousands of AI Agent skills in the Killer-Skills directory. Supports Claude Code, Windsurf, Cursor, and more.
Subagent-driven development is a methodology that executes plans by dispatching fresh subagents per task, with two-stage reviews for spec compliance and code quality.
gh-fix-ci is a skill that automates GitHub CI fixes by inspecting PRs for issues and proposing a fix plan using the gh command.
unix-review is a code review skill that applies the principles of the Unix philosophy to evaluate code quality and simplicity.
supply-chain-secure-code is a set of TypeScript coding patterns that defend against supply chain attacks by securing dependencies and credentials in application code.
Vue is a skill that provides customized code generation and auditing capabilities for Vue components, utilizing commands like `/vue <path>` and integrating with Element Plus and TypeScript.
Steering is a workflow management skill that enables AI agents to plan, track, and review tasks using a structured approach.
next-best-practices is a set of guidelines for optimizing Next.js projects, including rules for file conventions, RSC boundaries, and middleware configuration.
review-sdk-update-pr is a skill that automates the review process for SDK updates, using technical inputs like sdk, newVersion, and PR branch or number.
sd-review is a code analysis skill that combines defect review and refactoring analysis for comprehensive code evaluation
review-issue-implementation is a skill that assesses code changes against issue cards and ExecPlans, ensuring adherence to the DRY principle and best practices.
review-code-and-pr is a template repository for initiating Go services, emphasizing separation of business logic and infrastructure for enhanced testability and maintainability.
Kritarch Lite gives you a panel of AI agents that analyze the problem from competing angles, challenge each other's reasoning, and deliver a structured verdict. You review the conclusion, not the process.