bayesian-reasoning-agents — community bayesian-reasoning-agents, canvas-lms-mcp, community, ide skills, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf

v1.0.0
GitHub

About this Skill

Ideal for Hypothesis-Driven Agents requiring advanced Bayesian reasoning and git worktree integration for data-driven decision making. MCP Server for connecting agents to Instructure Canvas LMS

sweeden-ttu sweeden-ttu
[0]
[0]
Updated: 3/5/2026

Agent Capability Analysis

The bayesian-reasoning-agents skill by sweeden-ttu is an open-source community AI agent skill for Claude Code and other IDE workflows, helping agents execute tasks with better context, repeatability, and domain-specific guidance.

Ideal Agent Persona

Ideal for Hypothesis-Driven Agents requiring advanced Bayesian reasoning and git worktree integration for data-driven decision making.

Core Value

Empowers agents to leverage Bayesian reasoning for hypothesis-driven development, utilizing git worktrees for efficient collaboration and version control, and integrating with the MCP Server for seamless connectivity to Instructure Canvas LMS.

Capabilities Granted for bayesian-reasoning-agents

Developing hypothesis-driven models using Bayesian reasoning
Automating evidence collection and analysis with git worktree management
Integrating with Instructure Canvas LMS for streamlined educational content delivery

! Prerequisites & Limits

  • Requires git worktree setup and configuration
  • Dependent on MCP Server for Instructure Canvas LMS connectivity
  • Limited to Bayesian reasoning and hypothesis-driven development applications
Labs Demo

Browser Sandbox Environment

⚡️ Ready to unleash?

Experience this Agent in a zero-setup browser environment powered by WebContainers. No installation required.

Boot Container Sandbox

bayesian-reasoning-agents

Install bayesian-reasoning-agents, an AI agent skill for AI agent workflows and automation. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf with one-command...

SKILL.md
Readonly

Bayesian Reasoning Agents

Three-agent system for hypothesis-driven development using Bayesian reasoning and git worktrees.

Architecture Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                        Bayesian Orchestrator                             │
├───────────────────┬─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┤
│   Agent 1:        │   Agent 2:          │   Agent 3:                    │
│   Hypothesis      │   Evidence          │   Backwards                   │
│   Generator       │   Evaluator         │   Reasoner                    │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┤
│ - Hypotheses      │ - Evaluate evidence │ - P(Cause|Effect)             │
│ - Experiments     │ - Update beliefs    │ - Conditional variables       │
│ - Predictions     │ - Verify results    │ - Causal graphs               │
│ - WT Schemas      │ - Create worktrees  │ - Suggest hypotheses          │
└───────────────────┴─────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┘
         │                    │                        │
         ▼                    ▼                        ▼
   worktree_schemas/    worktrees/branch-*     Causal Network

Quick Start

bash
1uv add numpy scipy pydantic
python
1from agents.bayesian import ( 2 BayesianOrchestrator, 3 OrchestratorConfig, 4) 5 6# Initialize orchestrator with all three agents 7orchestrator = BayesianOrchestrator() 8 9# Set up causal network for backwards reasoning 10orchestrator.setup_causal_network( 11 variables=[ 12 {"name": "bug_in_code", "description": "A bug exists in the code"}, 13 {"name": "test_failure", "description": "Tests are failing"}, 14 {"name": "recent_change", "description": "Recent code change"}, 15 ], 16 causal_links=[ 17 {"cause": "bug_in_code", "effect": "test_failure", "strength": 0.8}, 18 {"cause": "recent_change", "effect": "bug_in_code", "strength": 0.6}, 19 ] 20) 21 22# Reason from observation 23result = orchestrator.reason_from_observation( 24 observation="Tests started failing after deployment", 25 observation_vars={"test_failure": "true"} 26) 27 28print(result["hypotheses"])

Agent 1: Hypothesis Generator

Responsibilities:

  • Generate testable hypotheses from observations
  • Assign prior probabilities using domain knowledge
  • Design experiments with success criteria
  • Create worktree schemas for parallel exploration

Key Methods:

python
1from agents.bayesian import HypothesisGeneratorAgent 2 3generator = HypothesisGeneratorAgent() 4 5# Generate a hypothesis with prior probability 6hypothesis = generator.generate_hypothesis( 7 statement="The performance regression is caused by the new caching layer", 8 rationale="Caching was recently modified and correlates with slowdown", 9 predictions=["Disabling cache improves performance", "Cache hit ratio is abnormal"], 10 prior=0.6, # 60% prior probability 11) 12 13# Design experiment to test hypothesis 14experiment = generator.design_experiment( 15 hypothesis=hypothesis, 16 description="Benchmark with cache disabled", 17 expected_outcome="Latency returns to baseline", 18 success_criteria="p95 latency < 100ms", 19) 20 21# Create worktree schema for parallel exploration 22schema = generator.create_worktree_schema(hypothesis)

Agent 2: Evidence Evaluator

Responsibilities:

  • Evaluate experimental evidence
  • Update beliefs using Bayes' theorem: P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E)
  • Form refined hypotheses when results are inconclusive
  • Create git worktrees from schemas for parallel exploration

Key Methods:

python
1from agents.bayesian import EvidenceEvaluatorAgent 2 3evaluator = EvidenceEvaluatorAgent() 4 5# Evaluate evidence from experiment 6evidence = evaluator.evaluate_evidence( 7 experiment=experiment, 8 observation="Latency improved to 85ms with cache disabled", 9 matches_prediction=True, 10 strength=0.8, # Strong evidence 11) 12 13# Update hypothesis belief using Bayes' theorem 14updated_belief = evaluator.update_belief(hypothesis, evidence) 15print(f"Prior: {hypothesis.belief.prior:.2%}") 16print(f"Posterior: {updated_belief.posterior:.2%}") 17 18# Create worktree from schema 19worktree_path = evaluator.create_worktree_from_schema(schema)

Agent 3: Backwards Reasoner

Responsibilities:

  • Calculate inverse conditional probabilities P(Cause|Effect)
  • Find conditional variables for reasoning
  • Build and query causal graphs
  • Suggest hypotheses based on most likely causes

Key Methods:

python
1from agents.bayesian import BackwardsReasonerAgent 2 3reasoner = BackwardsReasonerAgent() 4 5# Add variables to causal network 6reasoner.add_variable("bug_in_code", description="A bug exists") 7reasoner.add_variable("test_failure", description="Tests are failing") 8reasoner.add_variable("memory_leak", description="Memory leak present") 9 10# Add causal links with conditional probabilities 11reasoner.add_causal_link( 12 cause="bug_in_code", 13 effect="test_failure", 14 strength=0.8, 15 conditional_probs={ 16 ("true", "true"): 0.85, # P(test_fail|bug) = 0.85 17 ("true", "false"): 0.15, 18 ("false", "true"): 0.1, # P(test_fail|no_bug) = 0.1 19 ("false", "false"): 0.9, 20 } 21) 22 23# Calculate backwards probability 24prob = reasoner.calculate_backwards_probability( 25 cause_var="bug_in_code", 26 cause_value="true", 27 effect_var="test_failure", 28 effect_value="true", 29) 30print(f"P(bug|test_failure) = {prob:.2%}") 31 32# Query for most likely causes of an effect 33query = reasoner.query_causes("test_failure", "true") 34print(query.results) # {"bug_in_code": 0.85, "memory_leak": 0.2, ...} 35 36# Find conditional variables for reasoning 37relevant = reasoner.find_conditional_variables( 38 target_var="test_failure", 39 observed_vars=["recent_change"] 40) 41 42# Suggest hypotheses based on backwards reasoning 43suggestions = reasoner.suggest_hypotheses_from_effect("test_failure", "true")

Worktree Schema Format

json
1{ 2 "schema_id": "wts-a1b2c3d4", 3 "hypothesis": "Feature X causes performance regression", 4 "hypothesis_id": "hyp-x1y2z3", 5 "branch_name": "experiment/hyp-x1y2z3-feature-x-causes-perfo", 6 "worktree_path": null, 7 "prior_probability": 0.6, 8 "posterior_probability": null, 9 "experiments": [ 10 { 11 "id": "exp-001", 12 "description": "Benchmark with Feature X disabled", 13 "expected_outcome": "Performance returns to baseline", 14 "success_criteria": "p95 < 100ms", 15 "status": "designed" 16 } 17 ], 18 "evidence_collected": [], 19 "status": "pending", 20 "created_at": "2026-01-30T12:00:00Z" 21}

Full Workflow Example

python
1from agents.bayesian import BayesianOrchestrator 2 3# Initialize 4orchestrator = BayesianOrchestrator() 5 6# Step 1: Set up causal network (Agent 3) 7orchestrator.setup_causal_network( 8 variables=[ 9 {"name": "cache_bug", "description": "Bug in caching layer"}, 10 {"name": "db_slow", "description": "Database queries slow"}, 11 {"name": "high_latency", "description": "High API latency observed"}, 12 ], 13 causal_links=[ 14 {"cause": "cache_bug", "effect": "high_latency", "strength": 0.7}, 15 {"cause": "db_slow", "effect": "high_latency", "strength": 0.8}, 16 ] 17) 18 19# Step 2: Reason from observation (uses all 3 agents) 20result = orchestrator.reason_from_observation( 21 observation="API latency increased by 50%", 22 observation_vars={"high_latency": "true"} 23) 24 25# Step 3: Get backwards analysis 26print("Most likely causes:", result["backwards_analysis"]["combined_most_likely_causes"]) 27 28# Step 4: Hypotheses were auto-generated 29for h in result["hypotheses"]: 30 print(f"Hypothesis: {h['statement']} (prior: {h['prior']:.2%})") 31 32# Step 5: Run experiments and evaluate results 33eval_result = orchestrator.evaluate_experiment_result( 34 experiment_id=result["hypotheses"][0]["id"] + "_exp", 35 observation="Cache hit ratio dropped to 40%", 36 matches_prediction=True, 37 strength=0.75, 38) 39 40print(f"Posterior: {eval_result['posterior']:.2%}") 41print(f"Status: {eval_result['status']}") 42 43# Step 6: Create worktrees for parallel exploration 44worktrees = orchestrator.create_all_worktrees() 45 46# Step 7: Export report 47orchestrator.export_report()

Bayesian Belief Update

The system uses Bayes' theorem to update beliefs:

P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E)

Where:
- P(H|E) = Posterior probability of hypothesis given evidence
- P(E|H) = Likelihood of evidence if hypothesis is true
- P(H)   = Prior probability of hypothesis
- P(E)   = Marginal probability of evidence

Example update:

python
1# Prior: 50% chance hypothesis is true 2# Evidence strongly supports hypothesis (strength=0.8) 3 4belief = BayesianBelief(prior=0.5) 5updated = belief.update(evidence_supports=True, strength=0.8) 6 7# Posterior: ~80% chance hypothesis is true 8print(f"Posterior: {updated.posterior:.2%}")

Backwards Reasoning (Abduction)

Agent 3 performs abductive reasoning - inferring causes from effects:

Given: Effect E is observed
Find:  Most likely Cause C

P(C|E) = P(E|C) * P(C) / P(E)

Where P(E) = Σ P(E|C_i) * P(C_i) for all possible causes

Example:

python
1# Observation: Tests are failing 2# Question: What caused this? 3 4reasoner.add_causal_link("bug", "test_failure", strength=0.8) 5reasoner.add_causal_link("flaky_test", "test_failure", strength=0.3) 6reasoner.add_causal_link("env_issue", "test_failure", strength=0.5) 7 8query = reasoner.query_causes("test_failure", "true") 9 10# Results (ranked by probability): 11# 1. bug: 0.72 12# 2. env_issue: 0.45 13# 3. flaky_test: 0.28

Best Practices

  • Start with well-defined causal structures
  • Use informative priors based on domain knowledge
  • Design experiments with clear success criteria
  • Update beliefs incrementally with each piece of evidence
  • Use backwards reasoning to identify non-obvious causes
  • Create worktrees for parallel hypothesis exploration
  • Refine hypotheses when evidence is inconclusive
  • Export reports for documentation and review

FAQ & Installation Steps

These questions and steps mirror the structured data on this page for better search understanding.

? Frequently Asked Questions

What is bayesian-reasoning-agents?

Ideal for Hypothesis-Driven Agents requiring advanced Bayesian reasoning and git worktree integration for data-driven decision making. MCP Server for connecting agents to Instructure Canvas LMS

How do I install bayesian-reasoning-agents?

Run the command: npx killer-skills add sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/bayesian-reasoning-agents. It works with Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Claude Code, and 19+ other IDEs.

What are the use cases for bayesian-reasoning-agents?

Key use cases include: Developing hypothesis-driven models using Bayesian reasoning, Automating evidence collection and analysis with git worktree management, Integrating with Instructure Canvas LMS for streamlined educational content delivery.

Which IDEs are compatible with bayesian-reasoning-agents?

This skill is compatible with Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Trae, Claude Code, OpenClaw, Aider, Codex, OpenCode, Goose, Cline, Roo Code, Kiro, Augment Code, Continue, GitHub Copilot, Sourcegraph Cody, and Amazon Q Developer. Use the Killer-Skills CLI for universal one-command installation.

Are there any limitations for bayesian-reasoning-agents?

Requires git worktree setup and configuration. Dependent on MCP Server for Instructure Canvas LMS connectivity. Limited to Bayesian reasoning and hypothesis-driven development applications.

How To Install

  1. 1. Open your terminal

    Open the terminal or command line in your project directory.

  2. 2. Run the install command

    Run: npx killer-skills add sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/bayesian-reasoning-agents. The CLI will automatically detect your IDE or AI agent and configure the skill.

  3. 3. Start using the skill

    The skill is now active. Your AI agent can use bayesian-reasoning-agents immediately in the current project.

Related Skills

Looking for an alternative to bayesian-reasoning-agents or another community skill for your workflow? Explore these related open-source skills.

View All

widget-generator

Logo of f
f

f.k.a. Awesome ChatGPT Prompts. Share, discover, and collect prompts from the community. Free and open source — self-host for your organization with complete privacy.

149.6k
0
AI

flags

Logo of vercel
vercel

flags is a Next.js feature management skill that enables developers to efficiently add or modify framework feature flags, streamlining React application development.

138.4k
0
Browser

zustand

Logo of lobehub
lobehub

The ultimate space for work and life — to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We are taking agent harness to the next level — enabling multi-agent collaboration, effortless agent team design, and introducing agents as the unit of work interaction.

72.8k
0
AI

data-fetching

Logo of lobehub
lobehub

The ultimate space for work and life — to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We are taking agent harness to the next level — enabling multi-agent collaboration, effortless agent team design, and introducing agents as the unit of work interaction.

72.8k
0
AI